<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Greek Text for Commentary on Daniel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chronicon.net/blog/hippolytus/greek-text-for-commentary-on-daniel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chronicon.net/blog/hippolytus/greek-text-for-commentary-on-daniel/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:06:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://chronicon.net/blog/hippolytus/greek-text-for-commentary-on-daniel/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 00:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chronicon.net/blog/?p=360#comment-22</guid>
		<description>How interesting, I didn&#039;t know Vatopedi was a monastery.  I don&#039;t know much about manuscripts in general and have been thinking of getting a book on them, any suggestions?

Vatopedi 290 is the main manuscript (which I think was previously called Vatopedi 260).  It is signified with an A in the critical notes. Vatopedi 1213 also exists which I believe is part of the same manuscript.

As I look over the German I think I made a mistake, the Manuscript that Richard read with ultra-violet light was Cod. Paris. Suppl. gr. 682 which, again, I believe is part of Vatopedi 290.  A fourth manuscript Petropol. gr. 346 goes with them.  All four of these manuscripts are symbolized with the letter A in the apparatus and in the introduction Richard discusses what order they go in.

Again, if anyone knows better, please let me know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How interesting, I didn&#8217;t know Vatopedi was a monastery.  I don&#8217;t know much about manuscripts in general and have been thinking of getting a book on them, any suggestions?</p>
<p>Vatopedi 290 is the main manuscript (which I think was previously called Vatopedi 260).  It is signified with an A in the critical notes. Vatopedi 1213 also exists which I believe is part of the same manuscript.</p>
<p>As I look over the German I think I made a mistake, the Manuscript that Richard read with ultra-violet light was Cod. Paris. Suppl. gr. 682 which, again, I believe is part of Vatopedi 290.  A fourth manuscript Petropol. gr. 346 goes with them.  All four of these manuscripts are symbolized with the letter A in the apparatus and in the introduction Richard discusses what order they go in.</p>
<p>Again, if anyone knows better, please let me know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Pearse</title>
		<link>http://chronicon.net/blog/hippolytus/greek-text-for-commentary-on-daniel/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Pearse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chronicon.net/blog/?p=360#comment-23</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s the shelfmark of the Vatopedi manuscript (that&#039;s a monastery at Mt. Athos, so should have a numeral after it)?

My German isn&#039;t great either.  But I appreciate the notes!  Marcel Richard was the great scholar at the Institute de Recherche et Histoire de Textes, the French collection of copies of manuscripts.  Sadly he is dead, but a great man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the shelfmark of the Vatopedi manuscript (that&#8217;s a monastery at Mt. Athos, so should have a numeral after it)?</p>
<p>My German isn&#8217;t great either.  But I appreciate the notes!  Marcel Richard was the great scholar at the Institute de Recherche et Histoire de Textes, the French collection of copies of manuscripts.  Sadly he is dead, but a great man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

